Thursday, November 11, 2004
Bruce Schneier blog entry on e-voting
Bruce Schneier is a very insightful thinker about security.
I disagree with speed, but anyway.
Schneier on Security - November 10, 2004
The Problem with Electronic Voting Machines
via Slashdot Schneier On Electronic Voting
Basically, a voting system has four required characteristics:
1. Accuracy. The goal of any voting system is to establish the intent of each individual voter, and translate those intents into a final tally. To the extent that a voting system fails to do this, it is undesirable. This characteristic also includes security: It should be impossible to change someone else’s vote, ballot stuff, destroy votes, or otherwise affect the accuracy of the final tally.
2. Anonymity. Secret ballots are fundamental to democracy, and voting systems must be designed to facilitate voter anonymity.
3. Scalability. Voting systems need to be able to handle very large elections. One hundred million people vote for president in the United States. About 372 million people voted in India’s June elections, and over 115 million in Brazil’s October elections. The complexity of an election is another issue. Unlike many countries where the national election is a single vote for a person or a party, a United States voter is faced with dozens of individual election: national, local, and everything in between.
4. Speed. Voting systems should produce results quickly. This is particularly important in the United States, where people expect to learn the results of the day’s election before bedtime. It’s less important in other countries, where people don’t mind waiting days -- or even weeks -- before the winner is announced.
I disagree with speed, but anyway.
Schneier on Security - November 10, 2004
The Problem with Electronic Voting Machines
via Slashdot Schneier On Electronic Voting
Comments:
Post a Comment